Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
David Gilbert
dgilbert at dclg.ca
Wed Apr 26 14:35:10 UTC 2006
>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Jakubik <mikej at rogers.com> writes:
Mike> Steven Hartland wrote:
>> Forget Intel and go for AMD who beat them hands down for DB work:
>> http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=2745
Mike> It will be interesting to see how Intels new CPUs (Conroe,
Mike> Woodcrest, etc) will perform. From initial gaming benchmarks,
Mike> they seems to outperform the current AMD offerings. But for
Mike> current technology i agree, go for an Opteron system.
This isn't random. As I understand the issue, the Opteron HT bus
handles synchronization much faster. So for a game --- this doesn't
matter ... games don't (usually) need sync. Databases, however, live
on synchonizaton. If you're a Dell man (and already paying the Dell
tax), consider the Sun 1U's. They offer up to 4 cores in a 1U.
Dave.
--
============================================================================
|David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two things can be |
|Mail: dave at daveg.ca | equal if and only if they |
|http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. |
=========================================================GLO================
More information about the freebsd-performance
mailing list