Bumping libreoffice

[Dominic Fandrey]

On 08/02/2013 21:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 09:19:27PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 07:50:26PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>>> Please take note of Porters' Handbook section 5.2.2.1.
>>>
>>> Build fixes are NOT a reason to bump portrevision!
>>>
>>
>>
>> Have a look at the history Jung-uk has never done any graticious bump on this
>> port.
>>
>> I personnally resigned on maintaining LibreOffice exactly because of reactions
>> like this one, (also because Jung-uk Kim is actually doing a far better job on
>> it than me :)).
>>
>> regards,
>> Bapt
> 
> 
> Sorry I probably over-reacted because I still remember the frustrations from
> when I maintained LibreOffice.

No, I'm grateful for you telling me that my e-mail was offensive.
I'd just like to know how it offended, so that I can avoid this
in the future.

-- 
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?