libreoffice, 10-current, and clang

[Jung-uk Kim]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2012-07-07 19:23:07 -0400, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Doug Barton <dougb at freebsd.org>
> wrote:
>> Even though I am on 10-current, where the clang --version is
>> nominally the same as the one in ports, the current version of
>> the libreoffice port is telling me I need to install the clang
>> port. Why?
>> 
>> Also, the port has this:
>> 
>> CXXCPP= ${LOCALBASE}/bin/clang++ -E CPP=
>> ${LOCALBASE}/bin/clang -E
>> 
>> whereas for CPP at least the wiki says specifically not to do
>> that, but to use clang-cpp instead. Why the discrepancy here?
> 
> Oddly, the Makefile has commented out code to check for clang in
> base: #.if !exists(/usr/bin/clang) #BUILD_DEPENDS+=
> ${LOCALBASE}/bin/clang:${PORTSDIR}/lang/clang #USE_BINUTILS=  yes 
> #CXXCPP=        clang++ -E #CPP=   clang -E #.endif
> 
> But the version in 9-stable of the past several weeks is 3.1, so, 
> unless the ports version has some important changes, it looks like
> it is a waste of time to build the port of both clang and llvm.

FYI, clang in the head and ports tree have the same regression.  You
can patch contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp[1] and do
buildworld & installworld Then, update the ports tree[2] and try "make
WITH_SYSTEM_CLANG=yes".

Jung-uk Kim

1.
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp?view=patch&r1=159717&r2=159895
2.  http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201207102353.q6ANrDtx051945
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk/8xlMACgkQmlay1b9qnVOL9QCgqD7PT6JViNz2fVwyGVQZIN+C
xIsAoLiSaqfRwNkUV6NPrnbq8AWIex3c
=/OpE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----