ports/164230: repocopy request: editors/openoffice.org-3-devel to editors/apache-openoffice-3-devel

[Pedro Giffuni]

Sorry to bother so much.. but.. what about

PKGNAMEPREFIX= ${LANG_PKGNAME}${LANG_SUFFIX}-apache-
PKGNAMESUFFIX= -devel

:)

Pedro.

--- Mar 17/1/12, Maho NAKATA <chat95 at mac.com> ha scritto:

> Hi all and Pedro,
> 
> so let's have a ballot;
> 
> 1. en-openoffice-3-devel_US
> 2. en_US-apache-openoffice-3-devel
> 
> I vote for 2.
> 
> Pedro:
> 
> Unfortunately, it is not. 
> In the ports tree, language name should add as prefix.
> cf. 
> 
> $ cd ports/russian/rux/Makefile ; make -V PKGNAME 
> $ cd ports/french/homard/Makefile ; make -V PKGNAME 
> etc...
> it is documented in porters hand book.
> 
> 5.2.5 Package Naming Conventions
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-naming.html
> The package name should look like
> [language[_region]]-name[[-]compiled.specifics]-version.numbers.
> 
> en_US-apache-openoffice-3-devel should fit the
> conventions.
> 
> thanks,
>  Nakata Maho
> 
> From: Pedro Giffuni <pfg at freebsd.org>
> Subject: Re: ports/164230: repocopy request:
> editors/openoffice.org-3-devel to
> editors/apache-openoffice-3-devel
> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:08:17 -0800 (PST)
> 
> > Hi Maho;
> > 
> > How about 
> > PKGNAMEPREFIX= apache-
> > PKGNAMESUFFIX= ${LANG_PKGNAME}${LANG_SUFFIX}
> > 
> > So we get:
> > apache-openoffice-3-devel-en_US
> > 
> > (We should probably take the 3 out too)
> > 
> > cheers,
> > 
> > Pedro.
> > 
> > --- Mar 17/1/12, Maho NAKATA <maho at FreeBSD.org>
> ha scritto:
> > 
> >> Hi all,
> >> 
> >> Many thanks for discussion.
> >> 
> >> It looks all understands adding "apache" makes
> sense.
> >> 
> >> However, PKGNAMEPREFIX is defined as
> ${LANG_PKGNAME}, and
> >> PKGNAMESUFFIX is 
> >> defined as ${LANG_SUFFIX} therefore, English and
> Japanese
> >> version 
> >> should be something like: 
> >> 
> >> en-openoffice-3-devel_US
> >> and
> >> ja-openoffice-3-devel_JP
> >> .
> >> 
> >> Adding apache looks long.
> >> en-apache-openoffice-3-devel_US
> >> ja-apache-openoffice-3-devel_JP
> >> 
> >> In my opinion, choosing politically correct one is
> good.
> >> 
> >> so let's have a ballot;
> >> 1. en-openoffice-3-devel_US
> >> 2. en-apache-openoffice-3-devel_US
> >> 
> >> for me,
> >> 2. en-apache-openoffice-3-devel_US
> >> 
> >> thanks
> >> 
> >> 
> >> From: Eitan Adler <lists at eitanadler.com>
> >> Subject: Re: Fw: ports/164230: repocopy request:
> >> editors/openoffice.org-3-devel to
> >> editors/apache-openoffice-3-devel
> >> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:48:55 -0500
> >> 
> >> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Pedro
> Giffuni <pfg at freebsd.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > 
> >> >> Adding the Apache name to the brand is
> the
> >> standard Apache
> >> >> policy and in the ports tree we already
> have more
> >> that
> >> >> 50 ports for apache projects using the
> "Apache"
> >> name.
> >> > 
> >> > devel/subversion ?
> >> > java/axis2 ?
> >> > 
> >> > It may make sense to add apache to
> PKGNAMEPREFIX but
> >> please don't move the port.
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > -- 
> >> > Eitan Adler
> >> > 
> >> 
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-office at freebsd.org
> mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-office
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-office-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
> > 
>