iflib-if_em tests with HEAD and lagg panic [Was: Re: svn commit: r333338 - in stable/11/sys: dev/bnxt kern net sys]

[Stephen Hurd]

No need to test the latest revision unless/until you get a LOR or a panic
(both should be possible with the revision you currently have).  With the
recent addition of a simple EBR API, mmacy@ is working on a better
solution.  If possible, it would be great to have you re-test it once that
is up.

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 2:02 PM, Harry Schmalzbauer <freebsd at omnilan.de>
wrote:

>  Bezüglich Harry Schmalzbauer's Nachricht vom 10.05.2018 19:54 (localtime):
> …
> > Please excuse that I'm not familar with the phabricator and just did
> > "raw diff download" after briefly flying over the comments.
> > According to st_mtime this was on May 9th, 08:14:02 UTC (10:14 local
> > (CEST) time).
> > No idea what timezone phabricator reports to me, most likely respecting
> > local time.  Which means latest revision was part of my test – but I'm
>
> Oh, I missed "pm".
> Phabricator reports Wed, May 9, 9:49 PM
> <https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15355#324063> as last revision, my
> download was from 10:14 _AM_...
> But if the web site was respecting local time zone, I guess it would
> respect local time format, so not PM, but 21:49...
> So I think it's most likely any UTC+>2 time, so the revision I tested
> was probably Diff 42294 <https://reviews.freebsd.org/B16487>.
>
> Just tell me if it was useful for you to test the latest revision again.
>
> -harry
>



-- 
[image: Limelight Networks] <http://www.limelight.com>
Stephen Hurd* Principal Engineer*
EXPERIENCE FIRST.
+1 616 848 0643 <+1+616+848+0643>
www.limelight.com
[image: Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/LimelightNetworks>[image:
LinkedIn] <http://www.linkedin.com/company/limelight-networks>[image:
Twitter] <https://twitter.com/llnw>