Can tcp_close() be called in INP_TIMEWAIT case

Julien Charbon jch at freebsd.org
Thu Sep 24 12:13:42 UTC 2015


 Hi -net,

On 23/09/15 16:47, Julien Charbon wrote:
>  Thanks to Palle, I got access to the kernel dump.  And the results is
> more interesting than expected:  Thus somehow the kernel reaches a state
> in tcp_detach() where:
> 
> INP_TIMEWAIT && INP_DROPPED && tp != NULL
> 
>  In details:
> 
>  - inp is in TIMEWAIT state
>  - inp has been dropped by in_pcbdrop()
>  - inp->inp_ppcb (a struct tcptw) is not NULL
> 
>  All the related structures looks good from the coredump:  socket, inp,
> and tcptw, thus no sign of any memory corruption (so far).
> 
>  And for the kernel, this state it is _not_ ok.  Hopefully, there are
> only two functions that set the INP_DROPPED flags:
> 
>  - tcp_twclose() and,
>  - tcp_close()
> 
>  If tcp_twclose() is called inp->inp_ppcb is set to NULL and the struct
> tcptw is freed (all good, not assertion)
> 
>  If tcp_close() is called inp->inp_ppcb is left untouched (less ok,
> potential assertion)
> 
>  Almost all tcp_close() calls (or tcp_close() parents calls) use a
> pattern like:
> 
>  if (inp->inp_flags & INP_TIMEWAIT) {
>    /* Don't call tcp_close() just return */
>    return;
>  }
> 
>   /* Call tcp_close() */
>   tcp_close();
> 
>  But not _all_ tcp_close() calls.
> 
>  Thus the most important point here is:  Either this assertion is wrong,
> either tcp_close() in INP_TIMEWAIT state should not happen.
> 
>  This assert and tcp_close() current behavior is here since a long time,
> thus I would like old beards^W^W^W more experimented TCP stack
> developers to give an opinion/refresh theirs memories on this very
> specific case.

 So the issue is:

 - tcp_close() is called for some reasons with an inp in INP_TIMEWAIT
state and sets the INP_DROPPED flag,
 - tcp_detach() is called when the last reference on socket is dropped

 then now in_pcbfree() can be called twice instead of once:

 1. First in tcp_detach():

static void
tcp_detach(struct socket *so, struct inpcb *inp)
{
        struct tcpcb *tp;
        tp = intotcpcb(inp);

        if (inp->inp_flags & INP_TIMEWAIT) {
                if (inp->inp_flags & INP_DROPPED) {
                        in_pcbdetach(inp);
                        in_pcbfree(inp); <--
                }

 2. Second when tcptw expires here:

void
tcp_twclose(struct tcptw *tw, int reuse)
{
        struct socket *so;
        struct inpcb *inp;

        inp = tw->tw_inpcb;

        tcp_tw_2msl_stop(tw, reuse);
        inp->inp_ppcb = NULL;
        in_pcbdrop(inp);

        so = inp->inp_socket;
        if (so != NULL) {
                ...
        } else {
                in_pcbfree(inp); <--
        }

 This behavior is backed by Palle kernel panic backstraces and coredumps.

 o Solutions:

 Long:  Forbid to call tcp_close() when inp is in INP_TIMEWAIT state,
the TCP stack rule being:

 - if !INP_TIMEWAIT: Call tcp_close()
 - if INP_TIMEWAIT: Call tcp_twclose() (or call nothing, the tcptw will
expire/be recycled anyway)

 Short:
  if INP_TIMEWAIT & INP_DROPPED:
    Do not call in_pcbfree(inp) in tcp_detach() unless tcptw is already
discarded.

 The long solution seems cleaner, backed by tcp_detach() old comments
and most of current tcp_close() calls but I won't take that longer path
without -net approval first.

 Thanks.

--
Julien

"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and
wrong" -- H. L. Mencken

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/attachments/20150924/61abcbc9/attachment.bin>


More information about the freebsd-net mailing list