ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance

[Daniel Braniss]

> On 24 Aug 2015, at 10:22, Hans Petter Selasky <hps at selasky.org> wrote:
> 
> On 08/24/15 01:02, Rick Macklem wrote:
>> The other thing is the degradation seems to cut the rate by about half each time.
>> 300-->150-->70 I have no idea if this helps to explain it.
> 
> Might be a NUMA binding issue for the processes involved.
> 
> man cpuset
> 
> --HPS

I can’t see how this is relevant, given that the same host, using the mellanox/mlxen
behave much better.
I’m getting different results with the intel/ix depending who is the nfs server


danny