Intel Support for FreeBSD

[Barney Cordoba]

This kind of stupidity really irritates me. The commercial use of FreeBSD is the only reason that there is a project, and anyone with 1/2 a brain knows that companies with products based on freebsd can't just upgrade their tree every time some geek gets around to writing a patch. Maybe its the reason that linux sucks but everyone uses it? 10 years later, some old brain dead mentality.


On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 2:49 PM, John-Mark Gurney <jmg at funkthat.com> wrote:
 


Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net wrote this message on Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 06:24 -0700:
> Ok. It was a lot more convenient when it was a standalone module/tarball so you didn't have to surgically extract it from the tree and spend a week trying to get it to compile with whatever version you happened to be running. So if you're running 9.1 or 9.2 you could still use it seamlessly. 
> 
> Negative Progress is inevitable. 

The problem is that you are using an old version of FreeBSD that only
provides security update...  The correct solution is to update your
machines...

I'd much rather have Intel support it in tree, meaning that supported
versions of FreeBSD have an up to date driver, than to cater to your
wants of using older releases of FreeBSD...

Thanks.


> On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 9:57 PM, Mike Tancsa <mike at sentex.net> wrote:
>  
> 
> 
> On 8/12/2014 9:16 PM, Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net wrote:
> 
> > I notice that there hasn't been an update in the Intel Download Center since July. Is there no official support for 10?
> 
> Hi,
> The latest code is committed directly into the tree by Intel
> 
> eg
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/2014-July/060947.html
> and
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/2014-June/059904.html
> 
> They have been MFC'd to RELENG_10 a few weeks ago

-- 
  John-Mark Gurney                Voice: +1 415 225 5579

     "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."