[PATCH] Don't imply TCP and UDP socket options are bitmasks

[Eitan Adler]

On 14 January 2013 15:50, John Baldwin <jhb at freebsd.org> wrote:
> Using a bitmask forces us to run out of bits and makes it
> harder for vendors to try to use a high range of values for local custom
> options (hoping that they never conflict with a new option value added in
> stock FreeBSD).

We should explicitly decide and #define the boundary value for custom options.


-- 
Eitan Adler