Odd NAT/IPSEC question -- help! :-)

Sami Halabi sodynet1 at gmail.com
Sun Apr 21 03:54:24 UTC 2013


Be sure default gateway is properly cobfigured on the client not only the
tunnel
Sami
On Apr 21, 2013 6:42 AM, "Karl Denninger" <karl at denninger.net> wrote:

> I don't think so -- gre is not involved in the config.
>
> On 4/20/2013 7:59 PM, Steven Hartland wrote:
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Karl Denninger" <karl at denninger.net>
> > ...
> >> My "ordinary" NAT entry is simply "nat 1 ip from any to any via em1",
> >> which works fine for ordinary "on the client" traffic; no problems with
> >> that.
> > ...
> >
> > Just a stab in the dark, as I vaguely remember something similar, do you
> > also need to configure your nat for gre as well as ip?
> >
> >    Regards
> >    Steve
> >
> >
> > ================================================
> > This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd.
> > and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of
> > misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying,
> > printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in
> > it.
> > In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission
> > please telephone +44 845 868 1337
> > or return the E.mail to postmaster at multiplay.co.uk.
> >
> >
> >
> > %SPAMBLOCK-SYS: Matched [+killing at multiplay.co.uk], message ok
>
> --
> -- Karl Denninger
> /The Market Ticker ®/ <http://market-ticker.org>
> Cuda Systems LLC
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>


More information about the freebsd-net mailing list