CARP over LAGG

Stefan Lambrev stefan.lambrev at moneybookers.com
Tue Aug 3 21:35:20 UTC 2010


Hello,

This should be possible. I do have 7.2 systems which have lagg0 on em0/em1
VLANs over lagg0 and carp over those VLANs. So I guess carp over lagg0 should no be a problem.


lagg0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
        options=19b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4>
        ether 00:30:48:c8:2f:50
        media: Ethernet autoselect
        status: active
        laggproto lacp
        laggport: em1 flags=1c<ACTIVE,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING>
        laggport: em0 flags=1c<ACTIVE,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING>

vlan4: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
        options=3<RXCSUM,TXCSUM>
        ether 00:30:48:c8:2f:50
        inet 10.62.4.253 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.62.4.255
        media: Ethernet autoselect
        status: active
        vlan: 4 parent interface: lagg0
carp4: flags=49<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> metric 0 mtu 1500
        inet 10.62.4.1 netmask 0xffffff00 
        carp: MASTER vhid 4 advbase 1 advskew 0

On Aug 3, 2010, at 5:55 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:

> Hello.
> 
> On a couple of 7.2 systems, I've got some carp interfaces build upon a physical interface (em0 or igb0) and everything works fine.
> 
> On both box I've tried aggregating two interfaces (resp. em0+em1 and igb0+igb1) into a lagg0 interface, using LACP.
> However, in this case CARP will stop working as all carp devices which work over lagg0 will stay in INIT state.
> 
> Is this a bug?
> Is "carp over lagg" possible at all?
> 
> bye & Thanks
> 	av.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"

--
Best Wishes,
Stefan Lambrev
ICQ# 24134177







More information about the freebsd-net mailing list