kern/131781: [ndis] ndis keeps dropping the link

Paul B. Mahol onemda at gmail.com
Wed Feb 18 03:06:23 PST 2009


On 2/17/09, Adam K Kirchhoff <adamk at voicenet.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 February 2009 17:14:07 Paul B. Mahol wrote:
>> On 2/17/09, Adam K Kirchhoff <adamk at voicenet.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:22:22 +0100
>> >
>> > "Paul B. Mahol" <onemda at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=131781
>> >>
>> >> This one should not happen, 108 rate should get recognized.
>> >> I will try to reproduce it on CURRENT.
>> >>
>> >> To OP, could you try 7 STABLE after 31 Jan? I guess it should not
>> >> change anything but you never know.
>> >
>> > Sorry, I must have copied and pasted the uname output from the wrong
>> > machine.  This is actually FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE #4: Mon Feb 16 16:37:18
>> > EST 2009 :-)
>>
>> miniport dump NDIS_STATUS_UNSUPPORTED_MEDIA for error in
>> ndis_setstate() for setting OID_802_11_CONFIGURATION.
>
> Sorry if I seem slow, but are you asking me to check something there, or
> just
> stating what you think the problem is? :-)

You can add printf() before "ndis_set_info(sc,
OID_802_11_CONFIGURATION, &config, &len);" in ndis_setstate_80211() to
check what value for config.nc_dsconfig is by default.

Also try changing "sysctl debug.ndis=1" and post console debug ouput again.

>
>> > Could the fact that the rate is 108 also be causing problems for the
>> > native iwi driver?
>>
>> Unlikely, bug is in ndisulator initialization code.
>
> Oh well :-)  I'll take what I can get at this point.
>
> Adam
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>


-- 
Paul


More information about the freebsd-net mailing list