multiple routing tables review patch ready for simple testing.

[Bjoern A. Zeeb]

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Julian Elischer wrote:

Hi,

> a kernel needs to be created with the option ROUTETABLES=N
>
> e.g.
> +options                ROUTETABLES=2           # max 16. 1 is back 
> compatible.
>
> leaving this out will result in just a single routing table as per normal.
>
> the max is 16 but I have an artificial (even lower) at 8 but that may
> be gone by the time people try it :-)

After reading through this thread and not looking at the patch again
for the moment, where does this limit come from? Do you think this
could be extended to more in the future?

-- 
Bjoern A. Zeeb              Stop bit received. Insert coin for new game.