Ephemeral ports patch (fixed)
silby at silby.com
Mon Mar 3 21:23:19 PST 2008
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Fernando Gont wrote:
> At 04:11 a.m. 03/03/2008, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>>> Here's the same patch, but with the first ephemeral port changed from 1024
>>> to 10000.
>> Now that I've actually gone to try to apply the patch (so I can view the
>> two codepaths side by side, rather than in diff form), I'm finding that I
>> can't apply it. I think all the whitespace got stomped, either by your
>> mail program or my mail program. Can you please resent this as an
> Sure. Please let me know if this one is okay.
> Kind regards,
> Fernando Gont
> e-mail: fernando at gont.com.ar || fgont at acm.org
> PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
! #define IPPORT_EPHEMERALLAST 655535
Otherwise the patch looks good to me. It looked a bit strange in unified
diff format, I needed to look at it in context format. (Strange, since I
usually prefer unified.)
Rui, were you going to get this committed?
More information about the freebsd-net