panic: tcp_addoptions: TCP options too long w/
with TCP_SIGNATURE support
Bruce M. Simpson
bms at FreeBSD.org
Tue Apr 1 17:16:58 PDT 2008
Dontcha just hate broken vendor NAT?
Yes, it seems reasonable that SACK is the sacrificial victim.
Considering folk normally configure TCP-MD5 between routers which are
usually directly connected on the same switch, doing away with SACK
should be fine.
Funny, I was staring at that define moments ago whilst debugging a
totally unrelated piece of code in a different language.
More information about the freebsd-net