nat and ipfw - divert or builtin
randy at psg.com
Mon Sep 24 13:06:06 PDT 2007
> ipfw's integrated nat
> I believe the integrated version makes configuration simpler. I would
> choose the old classic divert with ipfw if it is for a important network
> that must work, but if I was running -current I would try the integrated
> variant beacuse it seems to be simpler to use.
you seem to imply that you have reason to suspect that ipfw integrated
nat might not be reliable, or at least not as reliable as divert+natd.
any particular experiences or gossip to tell?
More information about the freebsd-net