changing default route

OxY oxy at field.hu
Tue May 16 14:42:21 UTC 2006


but bridging needs ipfw (or pf) and with heavy traffic
it needs lots of cpu.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marcin Jessa" <lists at yazzy.org>
To: "OxY" <oxy at field.hu>
Cc: <freebsd-net at freebsd.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: changing default route


> On Tue, 16 May 2006 15:53:38 +0200
> "OxY" <oxy at field.hu> wrote:
> 
>> any other solution?
>> can i solve it with static routing?
> 
> Create a bridge interface, assign both the nics as it's members and
> assign the IP to it.
> 
> Marcin.
> 
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Charles Swiger" <cswiger at mac.com>
>> To: "OxY" <oxy at field.hu>
>> Cc: <freebsd-net at freebsd.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 1:10 AM
>> Subject: Re: changing default route
>> 
>> 
>> > On May 15, 2006, at 7:04 PM, OxY wrote:
>> >> have two interfaces with the same ip, em0 connected to another  
>> >> server with crosslink, em1 is the public, can be reached from the  
>> >> internet connected to a switch.
>> > 
>> > Don't do that.  Use bridging instead, if appropriate.
>> > 
>> > -- 
>> > -Chuck
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-net at freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"


More information about the freebsd-net mailing list