divert(4) socket isn't connection oriented
julian at elischer.org
Mon Nov 15 23:39:23 GMT 2004
Archie Cobbs wrote:
>Julian Elischer wrote:
>>If I did it again I think I'd suggest that divert not be a part of the
>>It was easiest tat that time to make it so..
>>Archie, do you remember why we decided this?
>At the time, the goal was to minimize the size of the divert patch rather
>than maximizing elegance, because this was determined to give it a better
>chance of being committed... in hindsight we could have structured things
yeah I remember now..
More information about the freebsd-net