divert(4) socket isn't connection oriented

[Julian Elischer]

Archie Cobbs wrote:

>Julian Elischer wrote:
>  
>
>>If I did it again I think I'd suggest that divert not be a part of the 
>>INET family..
>>It was easiest tat that time to make it so..
>>Archie, do you remember why we decided this?
>>    
>>
>
>At the time, the goal was to minimize the size of the divert patch rather
>than maximizing elegance, because this was determined to give it a better
>chance of being committed... in hindsight we could have structured things
>more clearly.
>

yeah I remember now..