shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks

[Gleb Smirnoff]

On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 01:31:09AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
J> > JE>> If you do that, I suppose you need to edit all the nodes, right?. In that
J> > JE>> case could you please convert the initialisation of the typestructs
J> > JE>> to use C99 sparse initialisation? In that case future changes will be a good
J> > JE>> deal easier.
J> > JE>
J> > JE>actually I don't know if you do need to edit the nodes
J> > JE>types.. At one time it was true that unassigned elements on
J> > JE>the end will be NULL.
J> > 
J> > Sure they will, but this will confuse the next one who is adding
J> > a new operation. I was just thinking: 'In the case that Gleb has nothing 
J> > else to do he could as well just take the chance...' :-)
J> 
J> He seems to have taken the bait
J> (heh heh)
J> 
J> It'd be best to make the change to sparse initialisers a separate patch
J> that I cold commit separatly,
J> so reduce teh size of the functionality change patch.
J> 
J> (or harti could commit it.., or ruslan)

Agreed. I make a series of patches then :)

Here is the first one - convert all ng_type initializers to C99 sparse type.

AFAIK, we also have two netgraph ports. Adding of preshutdown method will break
them. I'll fix ng_netflow port, and notify maintainer of ng_daphne.

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.
GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE