if_stf bug/feature

[Lukasz Stelmach]

On Tue, 11 May 2004 18:59:31 +0900 Ume wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 6 May 2004 10:21:13 +0200
>>>>> Lukasz Stelmach said:

Lukasz>> Well i *have*got* one v4ADDR that is assigned to my nat/router-box.  I
[...]
Lukasz>> harm. Let's say taht to the rest of the world the nat+TIGGER act like
Lukasz>> a single machine.
> Yes, current if_stf is too restrictive against NAT, and skipping
> certain checks enablea us to use 6to4 even behind NAT.  I believe it
> doesn't break RFC3056.

IMHO it does not if everything is going to be corect after the packets
go touring out of nat.

> Once, I made a patch to do so for a friend of mine.  But, it was based
> on old source and somewhat redundant.  I've just made a patch against
> recent 5-CURRENT.  But, I've not estimated if there are side effects.
> I don't have testing environment for 6to4, now.  Could you test it?

In one of my previous letters I have mentioned that i use 4.9-RCsomething
and unfortunately this is my only FreeBSD. I am also afraid :-( that
i don't have enough spare time neither. But please send the patch and
I will *try* to look at it if you don't mind.

Bye.
-- 
|/       |_,  _   .-  --,  Już z każdej strony pełzną, potworne żądze
|__ |_|. | \ |_|. ._' /_.         Będę uprawiał nierząd, za pieniąze
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/attachments/20040511/f825f894/attachment.bin