Dingo and PerForce

[Max Laier]

On Sunday 19 December 2004 05:23, gnn at FreeBSD.org wrote:
> 	For those who use PerForce and want to work on Dingo there is
> 	now a dingo branch, named "dingo".  The dingo branch contains
> 	all of src, not just sys, as I suspect there are userland bits
> 	we'll want to do.  I know I'll be doing userland things.
> 	Please make your own sub-branch off of dingo.  For example,
> 	here is mine (gnn_dingo):
<...>
> The main branch (dingo) is locked against changes and, more
> importantly, accidental deletion.  Let me know if there are any issues
> with any of this.
>
> Oh, and the integration from vendor to dingo was done last Saturday
> night around 23:00 JST.

I am not all that familiar with perforce so I am wondering: What is the 
benefit of having this branch if it will be tracking HEAD anyway, we can just 
branch off the normal vendor branch. Or do you plan to integrate parts back?

I have 'mlaier_carp2' off the vendor branch. What will be the benefit if I 
move it to 'dingo' instead?

-- 
/"\  Best regards,                      | mlaier at freebsd.org
\ /  Max Laier                          | ICQ #67774661
 X   http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/  | mlaier at EFnet
/ \  ASCII Ribbon Campaign              | Against HTML Mail and News
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/attachments/20041219/a31327f7/attachment.bin