Confusing message(4.8-RC)

[M. Warner Losh]

In message: <269400000.1048711273 at lerlaptop.iadfw.net>
            Larry Rosenman <ler at lerctr.org> writes:
: Is there a reason why the uplcom driver puts out the following when the 
: /dev node is ucom?

Because device name != driver name.  It should actually report that
ucom attached at uplcom, in a NEWBUSly correct world, but doesn't
right now.  I think due ot sharing a lot of code with NetBSD.

Warner