javavmwrapper - JVM order question
Achilleas Mantzios
achill at matrix.gatewaynet.com
Fri May 28 14:42:11 UTC 2010
i would say, just call directly your java executable.
i agree at first glance the javavmwrapper - bsd.java.mk combination is a mess,
yielding funny results.
Στις Friday 28 May 2010 16:39:32 ο/η Miloň Papežík έγραψε:
> Hi,
>
> I have problem/question regarding the order of JVMs determined by
> javavmwrapper
> when no JAVA* environment variables are set.
>
> When I do not have installed ports, the javavmwrapper determines the JVM
> according to /usr/local/etc/javavms.
> However when the ports are installed, the order is determined according to
> /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.java.mk.
>
> The problem is that each scenario gives different result.
>
> I would expect the javavmwrapper to be consistent - to use always
> /usr/local/etc/javavms
> and use bsd.java.mk as fallback when /usr/local/etc/javavms is not
> available.
>
> Should we change/fix javavmwrapper?
> What do you think?
>
> Thank you in advance,
> Milon
--
Achilleas Mantzios
More information about the freebsd-java
mailing list