New JDK release
girgen at FreeBSD.org
Wed Aug 9 07:44:47 UTC 2006
--On fredag, juli 14, 2006 14.32.24 -0700 Greg Lewis
<glewis at eyesbeyond.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 09:15:40PM +0200, martinko wrote:
>> i did so and portversion says:
>> diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i3220.127.116.11.07.00 < needs updating (port has
>> what's wrong ??
> Nothings wrong, the packages just have a "version" which is a little
> bit naughty and ends up comparing to the port (which isn't naughty)
> as an earlier version.
Just curious, what is the reason behind having different package names for
the port versus the package. It seems confusing to me. Also, since the port
just installs a binary, couldn't it just install the package? It would
cause less confusion, don't you think?
BTW, I'm extremely happy to have diablo out, and especially that the amd64
platform i supported already. Thanks a lot, guys!
More information about the freebsd-java