Tomcat 5.5 startup and shutdown.. again
tomasv at megalogika.lt
Wed Nov 9 00:57:20 PST 2005
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 05:02:36PM +0100, Herve Quiroz wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 10:00:12AM +0300, Tomas Verbaitis wrote:
> > I still think my proposed change still should be applied as it at least
> > gets the default situation right, when both tomcat55ctl and rcNG script
> > refer to the same JVM. The "administrative" approach to this problem
> > would be only to put a warning near the place where
> > jakarta_tomcat%%TOMCAT_VERSION%%_java_home is defined. "Technically" i
> > aggree that it's better to get rid of tomcat55ctl as a program, no
> > matter how convenient and usual it was.
> We now have reached the timeout for maintainer feedback on this topic. I
> was about to commit your suggested changes and then, after reading your
> message I was wondering whether this could be the right time to get rid
> of tomcat55ctl.
> So I ask tomcat users from this list for feedback. I would like to find
> out how often is tomcatXXctl used rather than the rc(8) script. After a
> short survey in my surroundings it seems like everybody uses the rc(8)
> script and thus removing tomcatXXctl would bring no harm now that rcNG
> script no longer uses tomcatXXctl...
i would vote in favour of removal of tomcatXXctl. those who loved it for
being short and comfortable and in default path -- like me ;) -- can
symlink the new rcNG script or whatever and get the desired comfort and
Tomas "Verbaitis" Verbaitis ** http://megalogika.lt
* šita gudri beždžionė moka dirbti su kompiuteriu *
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java/attachments/20051109/24bca979/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-java