Packages with diablo dependencies

[Greg Lewis]

On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 11:35:54PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 11:25:39PM -0700, Greg Lewis wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 04:48:47PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > It looks like 51 ports now depend on the diablo ports to build; this
> > > means the packages cannot be built on bento, since the diablo packages
> > > are interactive and impossible to build there.  Can you please do
> > > something about this?
> > 
> > Last time this came up I volunteered the attached patch.  Does it fix the
> > problem or not?  I didn't hear whether it did or didn't.  If it does fix
> > the problem I'll commit it.  If not, can you suggest a variable the package
> > install script can test for to workaround things on bento?
> 
> Well, I modified bento to set that variable in the build environment,
> and now it just hangs:
> 
> [...]
> this Agreement which, in Foundation's opinion, reasonably preserves
> the intent of this Agreement.  This Agreement is binding upon and
> shall inure to the benefit of Foundation and its successors and
> assigns.  This Agreement represents the entire understanding of the
> parties, and superceded all previous communications, written or
> oral, relating to the subject of this Agreement.
> 
> 
> Do you agree to the above license terms? [yes or no]

If it gets here its gotten too far.  The idea of the patch was to bypass
this for bento.

Are there _any_ special environment variables that bento sets when its
installing the packages for a build?  All we need is something which
the package install script and test for and say "Ok, this is bento".


-- 
Greg Lewis                          Email   : glewis at eyesbeyond.com
Eyes Beyond                         Web     : http://www.eyesbeyond.com
Information Technology              FreeBSD : glewis at FreeBSD.org