Recovery from disk+fs crash

[Robin Elfrink]

John Brooks wrote:

> how does the rest of the disk look? is the math correct
> when you run "disklabel da0"?

'disklabel da0' says 'no valid label found'.

Did you mean da0s1 ?

root@:~# disklabel da0s1
# /dev/da0s1:
8 partitions:
#        size   offset    fstype   [fsize bsize bps/cpg]
  a:   524288        0    4.2BSD     2048 16384 32776
  b:  2046640   524288      swap
  c: 142335837        0    unused        0     0         # "raw" part.
don't edit
  d:   524288  2570928    4.2BSD     2048 16384 32776
  e:   524288  3095216    4.2BSD     2048 16384 32776
  f: 138716333  3619504    4.2BSD     2048 16384 28552


Looks OK to me.


Robin