FreeBSD as Server

[Eric Anderson]

Alexander wrote:
> Alexander Leidinger пишет:
>
>> Alexander <shulik_freebsd at matrixhome.net> wrote:
>>
>>> http://linuxgazette.net/122/TWDT.html#piszcz - there is comparation 
>>> of Linux FS.
>>
>>
>> Since this doesn't cover the FreeBSD implementations of UFS or UFS2, 
>> this
>> doesn't say anything about the reasons why you want to use a 
>> different FS on
>> FreeBSD.
>
> So. Ext2/Ext3 is only modification of UFS and UFS is modification of 
> S5FS. That's why I don't think, that UFS or UFS2 work better than 
> ext2/ext3. But XFS and Reiser has big advantage.

I think these are gross generalizations, and not very true at all.  They 
are all different in their own right, and all have different performance 
charactoristics.  If you feel ext3 would be better suited to your needs, 
feel free to complete the ext2 port to ext3 for FreeBSD, I'm sure lots 
of people would enjoy it.  Better yet, finish the write portion of XFS.

Eric



-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Anderson        Sr. Systems Administrator        Centaur Technology
Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't.
------------------------------------------------------------------------