About DNS (BIND) with Database

Simon Gray simong at desktop-guardian.com
Mon Nov 17 07:20:25 PST 2003


> Bind9 ( name server x.x.x.2)
> Mydns x.x.x.3 (
> database )
> Bind9 ( name server x.x.x.1)
> Bind9 (
> secondary )
>
> in this environment ;

personally i wouldn't use bind, its had a bad security history.
tinydns/djbdns would be my prefered method. As for your design, seems ok but
replication is definatly the easier way - No generating horrible bind
confs/zone files :/



More information about the freebsd-isp mailing list