how dangerous would it be to switch to 5.1-current?
Lutz.Kittler at sse-erfurt.de
Tue Nov 18 23:51:32 PST 2003
Am Dienstag, 18. November 2003 22:01 schrieb Christoph P. Kukulies:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:36:39PM +0100, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, C. Kukulies wrote:
> > > Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 18:33:23 +0100 (CET)
> > > From: C. Kukulies <kuku at www.kukulies.org>
> > > To: freebsd-isdn at freebsd.org
> > > Subject: how dangerous would it be to switch to 5.1-current?
> > >
> > > With a gateway machine that runs 4.8 stable I'm considering to
> > > switch to 5.1-current (cvsup) at the danger of being off-net
> > > after the upgrade. Should I?
> > Too dangerous.
> > If you ask this question ('cause you havn't tried), you shouldn't
> > upgrade. At least not to -current. Maybe RELENG_4.
> Well, I have gone through a couple of such situations in the past since
> 386bsd :-)
> It's just the question whether i4b still works or works again
> under -current. Under 5.0 there were problems due to timer changes
> in the kernel.
> Is anybody running i4b under -current?
> Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku_at_physik.rwth-aachen.de
I am running 5.1 current with AVM Fritz PCI. No problems so far.
More information about the freebsd-isdn