IPFW: more "orthogonal? state operations, push into 11?

[Lev Serebryakov]

Hello Julian,

Thursday, August 4, 2016, 6:42:45 AM, you wrote:

> A combination is less useful for me as you need to do:
  I'm against this too, as I really love orthogonality, as everybody know
 already, and your example is good example why.

> 20 skipto 400 tcp from table(2) to me setup record-state
> 21 skipto 400 tcp from table(2) to me setup

> to make the entire session do the same thing.
 Sometimes it could be

20 skipto 400 tcp from table(2) to me setup record-state
21 check-state

 But only sometimes.

-- 
Best regards,
 Lev                            mailto:lev at FreeBSD.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 960 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/attachments/20160804/4da1480d/attachment.sig>