IPFW: more "orthogonal? state operations, push into 11?

[Lev Serebryakov]

On 02.08.2016 09:47, Julian Elischer wrote:

 I don't have rights to commit my changes, and looks like I can not
persuade others that my changes are Ok as-is, with all changes, made on
requests from reviewers.

 Personally, I think, that (1) + (2) is orthogonal to (3) and it should
be different change sets, reviews, etc. And, yes, (3) is great feature
by itself.

> Do we have any movement on these improvements?
> even similar functionality by different names is ok.
> 
> 1/ ability to use keep-state without an implicit check-state. <--- most
> important for me. (store-state)?
> 2/ ability to keep-state without actually doing it <---- less important
> for me.
> 3/ multiple state tables? this was discussed and I thought I saw patches
> but I haven't seen it going in,  <-- super luxurious

-- 
// Lev Serebryakov

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 949 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/attachments/20160803/45938748/attachment.sig>