layer2 ipfw 'fwd' support

Adrian Chadd adrian at
Tue Oct 5 01:43:20 UTC 2010

On Mon, Oct 04, 2010, Julian Elischer wrote:

>>> -Brandon
>> Yes, its still required since ipfw fwd ignores layer2 frames.
>> The application is the very same: squid. I mean, Lusca in fact (squid fork).
>> Thank you for your interest.
> Cisco/Ironport have a patch that does this..
> I had permission to bring it back when I worked there but never got it  
> committed.
> Adrian, was it part of the set I gave you?

I don't recall; but I'm happy to look at merging it into -head.
I was more after L3 interception than L2 interception.


More information about the freebsd-ipfw mailing list