kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION

[Andrey V. Elsukov]

Julian Elischer wrote:
>> About Vadim's prepositions:
>> 1. tablearg: it's possible, but now we use u32 argument in
>> tables, but counterlimits are 64-bits values. First of we
>> should extend our current table argument to 64 bit.
> 
> tables should be expanded to have different types of values..
> 32 but ints
> IP addresses (currently I'm overlaying it on 32 bit ints)
> IPV6 addresses.
> skipto locations
> byte limits..

Yes, i agree. As I remember, we already talked about this
some time ago.

-- 
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov