tables in ipfw2
nick at rogness.net
Thu Jun 24 15:47:47 GMT 2004
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 01:09:14AM -0600, Nick Rogness wrote:
>> Is there any reason why IPFW2 has not become the standard
>> IPFW...still not stable enough or ??? IPFW2 is backwards
>> compatible with IPFW is it not?
> It's standard in 5.x.
Sorry, I was referring to the 4.10 RELEASE and 4-STABLE.
Nick Rogness <nick at rogness.net>
How many people here have telekenetic powers? Raise my hand.
More information about the freebsd-ipfw