I have four ideia for IPFW2

[Luigi Rizzo]

On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 12:06:46PM -0300, Diego Linke - GAMK wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > There is already room in the O_LOG command header so we do not need
> > to modify ip_fw[2].h to add a field in the structure (helps with
> > binary compatibility). In fact, this would allow different levels of
> > verbosity in the logs.
> 
> I am sorry Luigi, but i not understand!
> 
> We have that to modify struct ipfw_insn_log, to pass one flag saying that one determined rule has log extended.

you can use spare fields in ipfw_insn o; for that

	cheers
	luigi

> We add an variable for indentify extended logs per rule. See:
> 
> typedef struct  _ipfw_insn_log {
>         ipfw_insn o;
>         u_int32_t max_log;      /* how many do we log -- 0 = all */
>         u_int32_t log_left;     /* how many left to log         */
>         u_int32_t extended;      /* Extended logs */
> } ipfw_insn_log;
> 
> I do not understand how make this without modify ip_fw.h file.
> 
> Do you have some idea ?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> --
> [ Diego Linke - GAMK ]
> System/Network/Security Administrator
> E-Mail/Site: gamk at gamk.com.br - http://www.gamk.com.br
> Public Key: http://www.gamk.com.br/gamk.asc
> Phone Number: (+5541) 9967-3464
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ipfw at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"