Mirror Site Requirements - Final Draft?

João Carlos Mendes Luís jonny at jonny.eng.br
Sun Jul 27 13:43:04 PDT 2003


Ken Smith wrote:

> On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 05:08:31PM -0300, Joo Carlos Mendes Lus wrote:
> 
> 
>>And isn't once a day too much for 
>>something that generally do not changes after beeing released?
> 
> 
> That I'm "waffling" over. :-/
> 
> If the mirror-announce@ list works well enough then syncing once a
> day for mostly static data is, as you point out, wasteful.  But
> once a week would be too much of a delay at Release Time.  I'm
> inclined to leave this requirement as-is for now and review it
> later, after mirror-announce@ has been in place for a while.

     Surely, there should be some kind of release effort from all mirror 
managers.  And mirroring everyday is just not enough.  You would just 
mirror an older release.  This is something that cannot be automated for 
secondary mirrors (disk space, the final frontier).

                                         Jonny

-- 
João Carlos Mendes Luís - Networking Engineer - jonny at jonny.eng.br
--
"the West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values
or religion but rather by its superiority in applying organized
violence. Westerners often forget this fact, non-Westerners never do."
-- Samuel P. Huntington



More information about the freebsd-hubs mailing list