Dual or quad NIC boards?
Samuel Clements
sclements at linkline.com
Fri Mar 26 12:12:46 PST 2004
I have one of the Intel Quad Gig nics running in 4.6-RELEASE.
em0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
options=3<rxcsum,txcsum>
inet 192.168.50.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.50.255
ether 00:04:23:08:15:f4
media: Ethernet 100baseTX <full-duplex>
status: active
em1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
options=3<rxcsum,txcsum>
inet 192.168.52.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.52.255
ether 00:04:23:08:15:f5
media: Ethernet 1000baseTX <full-duplex>
status: active
em2: flags=8802<BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
options=3<rxcsum,txcsum>
ether 00:04:23:08:15:f6
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX <full-duplex>)
status: active
em3: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
options=3<rxcsum,txcsum>
inet 192.168.54.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.54.255
ether 00:04:23:08:15:f7
media: Ethernet 1000baseTX <full-duplex>
status: active
-Sam
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-freebsd-hardware at freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-hardware at freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Shawn Barnhart
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 8:10 AM
To: freebsd-hardware at freebsd.org
Subject: Dual or quad NIC boards?
I'm in the market for a dual or quad NIC board compatible with 4-STABLE
(I'll do 5.x if I have to) for a router/firewall.
Intel make a couple, are they known to be compatible? The NOS software
compatibilty for the four port model lists it as "FreeBSD (latest kernel)",
whatever that means.
The 4-port one is my preference, although I'm not totally thrilled with the
prices I've seen for it -- nearly $500. Anyone familiar with any cheaper
versions?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hardware at freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hardware-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-hardware
mailing list