Hello

[outro pessoa]

Now, some would call this -and have -off-topic noise; but, there is a
reason for this post.

Some of you do not think before responding to a post. The words that you
choose need to be diplomatic and honest when you doubt another person's
intention and/or reason for that person's reply.
Your community is open.
For some of you, your minds are not.
It is time for a change in attitude and approach.


On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:53 PM, outro pessoa <outro.pessoa at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Seeing that you have quoted me from another email that I sent, my decision
> is to inquire you on different topics.
> Is the cognitive process the same for all members of the human species?
> By which method(s) does the human animal learn?
> By observation, each culture within an area has its own standards of
> normality. The world view of each culture is dependent upon the experience
> and understanding of the members of that culture. Education will coincide
> with the perception of each member of any given society. Now, that which is
> considered sane by the standards of one culture may be considered insane by
> the standards of another.
> In the scientific method, you must form a hypothesis and prove its
> validity.
> I will add this to Schrodinger's Paradox.
> Being that you are able to observe the quantum event from different
> perspectives, you will need to observe the same event from the viewpoint of
> the subject if such is possible. Your first hypothesis is that the subject
> seems incapable of logic and reasoning to such a degree that the subject's
> perception of the events occurring is false and flimsy at best.
> I have not experienced that which you have experienced and therefore I
> have no right to make any assumption about your nature.
> My reactions are erroneous ; yet, the reasons for my reactions are solid.
> Your judgement of me is based upon your own experiences and knowledge.
> The words "you" and "your" are both plural and general simultaneously.
>
> I have approached you openly and honestly, admitting to my faults.
> Each day, I learn.
> Because you are not me, I give you the benefit of the doubt - and, to
> admit, this usually occurs after my reaction - when the situation becomes
> more personal in nature.
>
> If you are not able to see the similarities between myself and another -
> and this being due to a physical condition - and that your experience with
> others has been negative because many do not think about anything but
> themselves, it is understood.
>
> I apologize and attempt to approach differently.
>
> There are times that a person may have a question to the mailing lists and
> that person is not addressed.
>
> I try to address the question to the best of my knowledge. Now, at times,
> I am perceived erroneously by other members of this community.
>
> If I say, " please do not insult me publicly," that does not mean you have
> the right to insult me at all. I did not do this to you. I would not and
> have not condemned you if anything has happened to you personally.
> My "threat" was a reaction to your disrespect.
>
>
>
>