patch(1) depends on RCS - should it?

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

In message <CAF6rxgni6kw6qtLMwWQdc2SuQp+Wa5-pTQwgSbTPa1-x_vznEA at mail.gmail.com>
, Eitan Adler writes:

>patch(1) explicitly tries to use RCS (and SCCS) in certain cases.  Are
>we okay with a base system utility that behaves differently depending
>on whether a port is installed? Should the relevant code be removed
>from patch(1)?
>
>See head/usr.bin/patch/inp.c lines 166 to 240 for details.

Yes, that code should be removed.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.