Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?

[Eduardo Morras]

At 11:25 17/07/2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>>>the behavior of shells is an even worse idea than turning this nanny
>>>behavior on for everyone.
>>
>>Add sysctl for apps is a no-no, sysctl is for system control, not userland
>
>still this stupid idea topics continue? Is FreeBSD finally intended 
>to be unix implementation or feature war with linux/windows?

Of course it continues. There must be one site for each thing, that 
way i (we) only search where it is and not where perhaps it should 
be. I suppouse that you want sendmail configuration on sysctl? Not 
all, only some config lines, other lines can be on rc.conf, 
sendmail.conf, maild.conf and 30 more conf files. It's better than 
having only one. There will be conflicts, changes between minor 
release of where is what, but, hey!! it's the way you want it.

>STOP IT.

NO. And i can write with bigger uppercase letters than you ;)

L