* Re: FreeBSD has serious problems with focus, longevity, and lifecycle

[Roman Kurakin]

Devin Teske wrote:
> [...]
> We could adopt a cycle similar to the Linux Kernel...
>
> Odd numbered releases are "experimental" while even numbered releases are "stable"
>   
I do not know the current state things in Linux kernel, but as far as I 
know 2.6 branch was
not "stable".  It was branch with a lot of experimental code and with a 
lot of API change.

rik
> (ducks for flying fruit)
>
> _____________
> The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-hackers at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>