RB_NOSYNC -> no device_shutdown ?
avg at FreeBSD.org
Tue Jan 10 10:23:50 UTC 2012
on 20/12/2011 16:11 John Baldwin said the following:
> On Saturday, December 17, 2011 6:07:51 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> and wonder why RB_NOSYNC is overloaded to mean that no
>> MOD_SHUTDOWN/device_shutdown cleanup should be done?
> Presumably most device_shutdown handlers were used for syncing storage when
> the module stuff was first added. I'm not sure how you would fix this now
> since you can't easily pass the 'arg2' flags down to each handler so that the
> appropriate ones could skip their shutdown actions.
I see what you are saying.
Couple of thoughts:
- maybe MOD_EVENT interface could/should be extended to pass another argument
along with the event type
- maybe various sync-ing stuff should be done in shutdown_post_sync event
handlers, or even via a new dedicated event
Hmm, it looks like the latter might actually already be the case.
And another tangentially related idea: maybe we should inhibit device/module
shutdown for the RB_HALT case given that it is a quite special case where the
system actually stays up and at least the keyboard is expected to be still
More information about the freebsd-hackers