Replacing BIND with unbound

[Doug Barton]

On 08/20/2012 02:19, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Doug Barton wrote:
> 
>> On 08/20/2012 01:55, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>>
>>> We will continue to reject this until there are more firm plans,
>>> proper documentation on the security support side, which I cannot
>>> remember Simon got an answer for.
>>
>> I gave a clear answer. If there are any pieces missing it's up to Simon
>> to follow up with Dag-Erling.
> 
> If you did, where was it.  My email client shows 1 follow-up to
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2012-July/039837.html
> and that was unrelated and not you.

You don't get to comment on the discussion if you're not going to follow
the discussion. :)

It's not up to me to advocate for the inclusion of unbound in any case,
that's up to Dag-Erling.

My point is simple ... BIND is not a good fit for the FreeBSD base, and
it needs to go. The fact that we not only have a solid replacement for
it ready to go, but a willing maintainer, is a bonus.

Doug

-- 

    I am only one, but I am one.  I cannot do everything, but I can do
    something.  And I will not let what I cannot do interfere with what
    I can do.
			-- Edward Everett Hale, (1822 - 1909)