criteria for patch inclusion in patch release?
avg at FreeBSD.org
Wed Apr 25 20:51:11 UTC 2012
on 24/04/2012 20:19 Kurt Lidl said the following:
> What determines the patch worthiness of particular fixes that
> have gone into a the source tree for inclusion into the next
> patch release of a given -RELEASE branch?
> As an example, there are two patches that improve life for
> those of us who use fxp ethernet adaptors (r233158, r233585).
> Both of these came out after the branch of 8.3-RELEASE,
> I believe. Neither of these patches are in 8.3-STABLE, as
> far as I can tell. I think they ought to be in at least
> 8-STABLE or 9-STABLE, based on their change dates and the
> "MFC after: 1 week"/"MFC after: 2 weeks" notations in the
> SVN entries.
> In my ideal world, these two patches would wind up in the
> first patch release of 8.3-RELEASE, but that's my ideal world.
> Is there some way to nominate these changes for inclusion
> in what will be the p1 release of 8.3?
> Thanks for any insight...
Only security issues and severe bugs affecting majority of the users get into
patch releases. "Normal" bug fixes (should) get into the next release.
More information about the freebsd-hackers