Porting PathScale's EKOPath Compiler Suite

"C. Bergström" cbergstrom at pathscale.com
Fri Nov 25 20:48:49 UTC 2011


On 11/25/11 04:38 PM, Tak Pui Lou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have tested the port from http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/path64-devel-20111117.tar.bz2 and http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/path64-20111115.tar.xz but the compiler failed in the following tests:
>
> 3/6 Test #3: regression_tests .................***Failed    0.81 sec
>      Start 4: hello_c
> 4/6 Test #4: hello_c ..........................   Passed    0.14 sec
>      Start 5: hello_cpp
> 5/6 Test #5: hello_cpp ........................   Passed    0.67 sec
>      Start 6: path64_bootstrap_test
> 6/6 Test #6: path64_bootstrap_test ............***Failed   42.28 sec
>
> 67% tests passed, 2 tests failed out of 6
>
> Total Test time (real) =  44.74 sec
>
> The following tests FAILED:
>            3 - regression_tests (Failed)
>            6 - path64_bootstrap_test (Failed)
> Errors while running CTest
>
> Are these known errors for that build?
Normally I'd bug you about using vanilla upstream, but in this case I 
think JK's branch is in better shape.  (Apologies about not merging it 
yet, but we have a QA project we'll be testing it with and open sourcing 
soon - compiler agnostic fwiw)

Specifically about your question - It's probably unexpected and I'm 
curious what processor and version of FBSD this is.
>
> I also tested it on a fortran code. Here is the runtime result:
>
> 0.923u /usr/local/path64/bin/pathf95 -O3 -LANG:copyinout=ON:recursive=ON -OPT:goto=ON
> 1.283u gfortran46 -O3
>
> I actually compiled gfortran with CLooG-PPL but the optimization flags from GRAPHITE does not change the run time of this code.
Am I reading the result correctly that we're faster?  You may also want 
to add/test -ipa to your flags..

Side notes :
     1) -ipa == LTO in gcc which I don't know if it works at all on FBSD 
(We have some linker work that may help this situation in the future)
     2) I don't care what others say - Graphite isn't afaik production 
ready so *if* you ever do see any performance gains from it - ensure 
that you strongly validate before using in production setup
     3) We've added the latest User Guide online - 
http://www.pathscale.com/EKOPath-User-Guide

Thanks a lot for testing!

./C


More information about the freebsd-hackers mailing list