llvm/clang a tool chain or just a compiler for FreeBSD?
kitchetech at gmail.com
Wed Jul 22 01:59:34 UTC 2009
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Shaowei Wang (wsw) <wsw1wsw2 at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Roman Divacky <rdivacky at freebsd.org>
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:34:29PM +0800, Shaowei Wang (wsw) wrote:
> > > Hi, hackers!
> > >
> > > Recently I am playing the clangbsd i386 branch and it works. I've
> > > that clang using gcc to linking object code or even doing assembling.
> > >
> > > clang from FreeBSD perspective will be a whole compiler tool chain or
> > just
> > > another C/C++ compiler (may using system's [GNU]as and [GNU]ld) ?
> > llvm people are working on "mc" which is a native assembler/dissasembler.
> > so the only part of the toolchain missing will be linker... now we
> > need as/ld (and gnu driver that knows how to talk to them)
> So what's the direction? Are we going to cut off all the GNU compiler tool
> chains and use the llvm/clang when it's mature.
> > roman
> freebsd-hackers at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
Well I did build 8.0-Beta2 with clang the latest svn though seems to have
broke the usb compile for me. Most likely due to a commit that was done but
clang is pretty mature to compile most things but for now I just have
CC=/usr/bin/gcc in my make.conf to build ports
More information about the freebsd-hackers