Confused by segfault with legitimate call to strerror(3)
on amd64 / sysctl (3) setting `odd' errno's
Christoph Mallon
christoph.mallon at gmx.de
Fri Jan 16 02:21:27 PST 2009
Christian Kandeler schrieb:
> On Friday 16 January 2009 09:53, Christoph Mallon wrote:
>
>>> int
>>> main() {
>>>
>>> int mib[4];
>>>
>>> size_t len;
>>>
>>> if (sysctlnametomib("kern.ipc.shmmax", mib, &len) != 0) {
>>> printf("Errno: %d\n", errno);
>>> errx(errno, "Error: %s", strerror(errno));
>> The use of errno is wrong. printf might change errno.
>
> I don't think printf() can set errno. And even if it could, it
Of course it can. See ISO/IEC 9899:1999 (E) §7.5:3.
> wouldn't matter, because C has call-by-value semantics.
This has nothing to do with call-by-value. errno is read (even twice!)
*after* the call to printf().
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list