Google SoC 2009 Idea

Siddharth Prakash Singh spsneo at gmail.com
Tue Feb 24 17:43:07 PST 2009


Yeah I sent the same proposal to all the *BSD mailing list, because I
am interested in doing this project . What's wrong in proposing the
same project in all the *BSD organizations?



On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:55 AM, Jordan Gordeev <jgordeev at dir.bg> wrote:
> Sam Leffler wrote:
>>
>> Siddharth Prakash Singh wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Ray Mihm <ray.mihm at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Title: Multicore Aware Process Scheduler.
>>>>> I have not gone through the process scheduler code of Free BSD.
>>>>> Hence, I am not yet aware about the current support for Multicore
>>>>> Architectures.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Talk to jeff at freebsd.org, the author of ULE.
>>>>
>>>
>>> What are your opinions on this project? What is the scope of this
>>> project?
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Linux Kernel 2.6.* currently supports SMP, SMT, NUMA architectures.
>>>>>
>>>
>>> Does the current scheduler has support for "CPU affinity/binding",
>>> mechanism for distinguishing varying capability of CPUs.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> These may be there already in ULE, although I'm not sure about NUMA.
>>>>
>>>> Ray
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Waiting for your response,
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I note you sent this same note to the netbsd mailing lists.  You might
>> want to do some more investigation before you propose a project.
>>
>>   Sam
>>
> It was also sent to the DragonFly mailing lists. :-)
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-hackers at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>



-- 
Siddharth Prakash Singh
http://www.spsneo.com


More information about the freebsd-hackers mailing list