TUNABLE_INT question

[John Baldwin]

On Tuesday 17 February 2009 5:21:42 pm Roman Divacky wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 09:31:12AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Friday 13 February 2009 5:16:07 pm Roman Divacky wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 03:55:44PM -0500, Ryan Stone wrote:
> > > > __FILE__ is a string so you can't concat that with anything to produce 
an
> > > > identifier.  In any case, the variable is static so there can't be any
> > > > collision problems with other files.
> > > 
> > > I was talking about the SYSINIT parameter. thats a section in a .o
> > > file, and I am getting collisions there...
> > 
> > Hmm, are you doing something like this:
> > 
> > #define FOO(string) \
> > 	TUNABLE_INT(string ## ".bar", &bar); \
> > 	TUNABLE_INT(string ## ".foo", &foo); \
> > 
> > FOO(baz)
> > 
> > That would collide as both of the TUNABLE_INT() invocations would have the 
> > same __LINE__ (the line number of the 'FOO(baz)').
> 
> no.. it was just two tunables in two files that happened to end  up in the 
same
> line. fixed now

Hmmm, odd.  Those should be static and not matter.

-- 
John Baldwin